# learning-weekly: a curated digest of ops and Go links, one issue a week > Learning-Weekly is a Chinese-language weekly that collects open source projects, articles and blogs, mostly around operations tooling and Go, published as Markdown issues in the repository and syndicated as RSS. It is a reading list, not software, and its value is curation rather than code. **eryajf/learning-weekly** — 📝 周刊内容以运维技术和Go语言周边为主，辅以GitHub上优秀项目或他人优秀经验。欢迎star点赞收藏👆🌟 - Repository: https://github.com/eryajf/learning-weekly - Website: https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly/ - Stars: 615 · Forks: 35 - Language: Unknown - License: MIT - Published: 2026-10-22 · Updated: 2026-10-22 · Language: en - Canonical page: https://hysenlabs.com/projects/eryajf-learning-weekly ## A reading list rather than a codebase Learning-Weekly is described in its repository as a weekly that records the excellent open source projects, articles and blogs encountered during the author's own weekly work and study. The stated purpose has two halves: to strengthen the author's own learning of good content, and to gather quality material in one place so more people can read it. That makes the project a different kind of artifact from most things reviewed here. There is no application here, and the primary language is listed as unknown. The top-level entries are a README, a LICENSE, a docs directory, a gorss file and a learning-weekly.xml file. There is no package.json, no build system and no test suite. The deliverable is words, arranged in weekly issues. For an engineer, the appeal is the filter. The author states that the content is screened once already, that the quality of what survives will not be too bad, and that the focus is operations technology and Golang, supplemented by good projects and good practices found on GitHub. The topics list matches: linux, go, go-library, vue, github and wiki, with weekly and learning as the format tags. The audience is Chinese-speaking practitioners, mainly. The README and every issue are written in Chinese, and the weekly also appears on the author's personal wiki at https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly/ with an RSS feed. If you do not read Chinese, this repository is close to useless as a source, which is a real constraint rather than a matter of taste. ## Issues are Markdown files filed by month The archive structure is the mechanism. Issues are stored as Markdown documents under docs, grouped into a directory per month, and the README carries a table listing every issue with a link into that directory. The naming convention is explicit and consistent: each file carries the sequential total issue number and the week within the year, so the entries run through the 244th issue into the 270s across the 2026 rows. Two things follow from that layout. First, the archive is browsable without any tooling. Reading the weekly means opening a file in a directory, and the README table is a complete index for the current year, which means GitHub's own file browser is the interface. Second, the numbering is the versioning. The total issue count is monotonic and the week number inside the year gives the second coordinate, so a link to a specific issue never breaks as new ones are added. This matters for anyone who wants to cite a specific piece of content from it later, and it is a better archival property than a blog with a single rolling index. The repository description also invites submissions through the issue tracker, asking readers to submit, recommend or self-recommend projects, articles and blogs. That makes it partly community-driven, and it also means the curation is not purely one person's taste over time, though the selection rules are not written down anywhere in what is documented here. ## The RSS feed is the reason to subscribe The most actionable line in the README is about syndication. It notes that many people want to subscribe to the weekly updates through the blog alone, and that this has now arrived, with a link to the feed at https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly.xml. That distinction matters. Reading a repository of weekly issues is a browse activity, and browsing a growing archive of Markdown files is slow. An RSS feed turns it into a stream, which is the format a weekly actually wants: a reader who wants it will see each issue arrive, and a reader who does not will not have to notice it. The presence of a gorss file at the repository root points the same way. The format is a machine-readable index of items within a git repository, so it lets tools that understand it discover the individual weekly entries as commits rather than as a single feed. In other words, the project is deliberately exposed in two ways, a human-browsed archive and a machine-consumable index. Both of those live outside the repository, on the wiki domain rather than on a raw file URL, which is worth knowing before you rely on them. If the wiki host moves, the subscription is the piece that breaks, not the Markdown. ## How to actually use it, since there is nothing to install There is no installation step for this project, and there should not be. Nothing is compiled, nothing is published to a package registry, and there is no binary to fetch. The documented ways to consume it are the blog, the RSS feed and the repository itself. Start with the feed rather than the archive. Open https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly.xml in a feed reader, and each new issue arrives as an item. From there, an issue links out to the projects and articles it covers, and those links are where the actual value is, since the weekly is a pointer to content hosted elsewhere rather than a piece of writing in its own right. If you want the archive rather than the stream, browse the docs directory in the repository, where the monthly folders hold the Markdown issues and the README table indexes the current year. Reading from the repository has one advantage over the feed: you get the full history including the older issues, whereas a feed reader only shows you what arrived since you subscribed. The one practical step worth taking is to look at the volume before committing. The issues are dense link roundups, and the archive already runs past issue 270. If you are triaging your reading time, the deciding factor is how much of it you will actually read, not how good the links are. ## MIT licence, one release tag, and a moving archive The licence is MIT, which is the permissive end of the spectrum: the Markdown issues can be reused, translated or republished with the notice retained, and there is no copyleft obligation and no patent grant. For a repository that has been republished and mirrored in other places, that permissiveness is part of why it spread. The versioning story is thin, and the mismatch is worth naming. The recent releases list contains exactly one tag, v1, dated 2022-06-16, while the last push was on 2026-10-04 and the issue list in the README runs into the 270s across 2026. So the content has been produced steadily for years without the project cutting releases. That is a normal choice for a publication rather than a library. There is nothing to install, so there is nothing to version, and tagging each week would be ceremony. The practical consequence is that you cannot pin to a release in the way you would pin a package; you consume either the live branch or the wiki. What that means for anyone building on top of it is simple. Do not build tooling that depends on a stable API of this repository, because there is no declared API and no compatibility promise. If you want to mirror the archive, copy the files and pin them yourself, which the MIT licence permits. ## How it differs from a general link aggregator The alternatives to a curated weekly are the obvious ones: an RSS aggregator feed, a personal bookmark file, or one of the large public awesome lists on GitHub. An aggregator is a firehose. It gives you everything published by everyone, and the filtering work moves onto you, which is precisely the work this weekly performs. A personal bookmark list has the opposite problem: it is private, so it does not survive you losing interest, and it never gets a second pair of eyes on it. A public awesome list is the closest comparison, since the repository topics even include an awesome-list reference to the author's own star list. The difference is cadence and editorial voice. An awesome list is a curated set that changes when its author changes it, which can mean a large diff or a quiet edit. A weekly has a hard unit of work, one issue per week, with a fixed selection made on a fixed schedule, and the accumulated history is the point. The cost of that model is language and format. Every issue is Chinese prose with links, which means it does not compose with an English-language reading workflow, and it is prose rather than structured data, so there is no machine-readable index of what was recommended and when. If you want the discipline of a curated weekly, this is that; if you want queryable data, it is not. ## Conclusion Adopt learning-weekly if you want a filtered, dated stream of ops and Go links that you can read in an idle moment without filtering the whole web yourself, and skip it if you need an English reference, a searchable API, or content you can rely on staying online, since the issues are written in Chinese and the archive lives in Git history and in one wiki. Before subscribing, open the RSS feed at https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly.xml and one recent issue in the docs directory, and note that the only tagged release is v1 from 2022-06-16 while the last push was on 2026-10-04, so the content moves without version bumps. ## FAQ ### What is Learning-Weekly and what does it contain? It is a weekly that collects open source projects, articles and blogs, focused mainly on operations technology and Golang, with good projects and practices from GitHub as additions. Each issue is a dated Markdown file in the docs directory. ### How do I subscribe to Learning-Weekly updates? Through the RSS feed at https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly.xml. The README also points to the author's blog at https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly/ where the issues are collected. ### Can I contribute to Learning-Weekly? Yes. The README invites readers to submit, recommend or self-recommend projects, articles and blogs through the issue tracker on the GitHub repository. ### What licence does Learning-Weekly use? The MIT licence, which allows the archived Markdown issues to be reused, translated and republished with the notice retained, with no copyleft obligation. ### Is Learning-Weekly available in English? No. The README and the weekly issues are written in Chinese, so the material is only directly usable by Chinese-reading practitioners. There is no English edition described in the repository. ## Sources - [eryajf/learning-weekly on GitHub](https://github.com/eryajf/learning-weekly) - [License: MIT](https://github.com/eryajf/learning-weekly/blob/main/LICENSE) - [Project website](https://wiki.eryajf.net/learning-weekly/) - [README](https://github.com/eryajf/learning-weekly/blob/main/README.md) - [Releases](https://github.com/eryajf/learning-weekly/releases) --- Hysen Labs editorial analysis, written from the project's own repository and release notes. Cite the canonical page: https://hysenlabs.com/projects/eryajf-learning-weekly