# SNN-Daily-Arxiv: a daily table of spiking neural network papers > SNN-Daily-Arxiv is a small Python script that refreshes a daily arXiv digest for spiking neural networks, rewriting a README table of titles, authors, dates and PDF links. The repository is nearly empty, carries no licence and documents no installation, so what you get is the digest and the script that produced it. **SpikingChen/SNN-Daily-Arxiv** — Update arXiv papers about Spiking Neural Networks daily. - Repository: https://github.com/SpikingChen/SNN-Daily-Arxiv - Stars: 520 · Forks: 39 - Language: Python - License: not declared - Published: 2026-10-22 · Updated: 2026-10-22 · Language: en - Canonical page: https://hysenlabs.com/projects/spikingchen-snn-daily-arxiv ## A README that is rewritten every day The repository is a reading list that regenerates itself. The description is one line: update arXiv papers about Spiking Neural Networks daily. The README opens with a date heading, Updated on 2026.10.20, and the rest of the file is a table of papers, most of them from the previous ten days. The format is deliberately plain. A collapsible table of contents holds a single entry, Spiking Neural Network, and then the table itself has four columns: Publish Date, Title, Authors and PDF. Each row carries a bold date, a bold title, the first author followed by et.al., and two links: the arXiv identifier such as 2610.23068v1 pointing at the abstract page, and a link cell pointing at the same page again. That is the whole product. There is no application, no dashboard and no query interface. The value proposition is that a researcher who follows one narrow field does not have to run the same arXiv search every morning, and that the result is a dated, immutable-looking record that can be scrolled in a browser or diffed over time. The repository layout backs this up. There are four entries at the top level: README.md, daily_arxiv.py, snn-arxiv-daily.json and a .github/ directory. The Python script is the generator, the JSON file is the machine readable copy, and the README is the rendered output. The .github/ directory is what usually holds the workflow that runs the script on a schedule, which is how the README came to be dated without a human editing it. ## Identifiers with version suffixes show revisions are tracked A detail in the identifiers is worth pausing on. Most entries carry a first version, for example 2610.23068v1 for the paper on foundation models for autonomous space robotics and 2610.23046v1 for SpikeQ, spike guided post training quantization for spiking neural networks. A few do not. The entry on large language model guided evolutionary discovery of native neural architectures carries 2609.40258v2, and the leakage resistant benchmark of SNN design choices for network intrusion detection carries 2606.01442v3, which is also the only entry in the visible list whose identifier belongs to an earlier month, June 2026, on a paper published in this digest on 2026-10-09. Those suffixes are the arXiv version markers, and their presence in the table means the digest is not only listing new submissions. A v2 or v3 entry is a revised version of a paper that already existed, so the list is closer to a feed of everything that changed on arXiv in this field than a list of brand new papers. That has a practical consequence for a reader: a title you saw last week can reappear with the same identifier and a new suffix, which means the underlying work changed rather than a second paper appearing. The dates in the Publish Date column run from 2026-10-16 at the top down to 2026-10-06 in the visible part of the table, matching the Updated on 2026.10.20 heading at the top of the file with a lag of a few days, which is what an arXiv announcement cycle would produce. ## One topic heading over a wide field The table of contents has exactly one entry, and that is where the project's editorial decisions show. Everything is filed under Spiking Neural Network, including work that would sit in quite different subfields. The visible rows cover hardware and silicon, for instance STISA, a 0.16 GOPS/W/PE single shot inference FPGA based SNN accelerator with algorithm and hardware co design, and PSA, a pruning friendly sparse aware accelerator for efficient sparse convolution in SNNs. On the modelling side there is The Dormant Spiking Neuron, a state driven mechanism for efficient spiking neural networks, and Beyond the Hamming Cliff, on compact spatial encodings that preserve semantic distance in spiking neural networks. On the theory side, Upper bounds on the number of causal pieces in spiking neural networks and Statistical Mechanics of Spike Trains, with self consistent activity ensembles and phase transitions, sit alongside Controlling the latency in temporal coded spiking models for neuromorphic datasets and Design and Analysis of Temporal Representations in Neural Networks. The application rows are just as scattered: Saliency Guided Replay for continual learning in deep SNNs, FidLIF for parallel training of high fidelity spiking neurons with exact BPTT, Spiking Neural Beamforming for multichannel speech enhancement on the edge, neuromorphic decoding from populations of spiking retinal ganglion cells, SDPAD as a fully spike driven pipeline for end to end autonomous driving, SpikeOcc for resilient multimodal 3D occupancy perception via spiking experts, and EM-SNN for remote sensing image dehazing. And there is the paper that uses a large language model to search for native neural architectures for spiking sequence modelling, alongside Compute Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models. The spread from FPGA design to sleep disorder modelling is the honest characterisation of the field the script is querying, and a single heading is a reasonable way to present it. ## What the repository does not tell you There is no installation section, no usage section and no configuration documentation. The README does not say how to run daily_arxiv.py, which arXiv query it performs, how often it is scheduled, or what its output looks like on a machine other than the one that generated it. There is also no licence file. The repository's top level entries are README.md, daily_arxiv.py, snn-arxiv-daily.json and .github/, with no LICENSE file among them, and the project metadata records the licence as unknown. That is a real constraint for anyone who wants to reuse the script, mirror the generated list or fold it into another workflow, because there is no stated permission and no stated terms. The project also has no GitHub releases, so there is no versioned artefact to pin, and no changelog beyond the dated README history itself. A reader who wants the script has to take it from the branch tip, which for a scheduled generator means taking it from whatever state the automation last left the repository in. The JSON file is the piece that would answer most of the structural questions, because a machine readable record of the same entries implies a schema and a generator that produced it. The README never describes its contents, so the shape of the data has to be discovered by opening it. For a project this small that is a defensible level of documentation, and it is also the level at which a user is asked to read the source. ## Reading the digest, and where it stops The practical workflow is short. You open the repository page, you see a date, you scan the titles for the past week, and you follow the links that interest you. For an author, the fact that a paper appears at all is a form of visibility, since the table is the thing that gets read. Two limits are obvious. The first is that the digest replaces a search, not a review. Every entry is a title and a link, so the quality judgment still happens in the paper, and the list is only a filter you apply by reading titles. The second is that it is a snapshot of one day. Nothing in the repository lets you go back and compare two digests, query by keyword, or filter by author or by subfield, which are the things you would want if you were tracking a literature over time rather than reading today's arrivals. For a second reader, the entry that links to a June 2026 paper with a v3 suffix is a reminder that the list is a feed of revisions, so counting rows will overcount the number of distinct works in any given week. The more interesting limitation is the single query. A script that asks arXiv for one topic phrase produces exactly the table above, with hardware papers, theory papers, application papers and language model papers interleaved. That is a usable default, but a reader with a narrow interest has to filter by eye on every visit, which is the cost the script is trying to remove. ## Against querying arXiv yourself The alternative is doing the search directly, and the difference in approach is worth stating plainly. Querying arXiv yourself gives you control over the query string, the date window, the categories and the fields you search, plus the ability to re-run yesterday's query with one changed parameter. In exchange you keep the bookkeeping: remembering the query, running it, reading the results in the site's own format, and noticing that a result list is not the same thing as a curated table. The digest inverts that trade. It fixes the query so that you do not have to, and it presents the result in a table where the date, the title, the author and the link line up in the same columns every time, which makes skimming a week cheap. The price is the same fixity from the other side: you get the query somebody else chose, you cannot narrow it without editing the script, and you inherit whatever the script's date window and result limit happen to be. There is a third option, a personal feed built on the arXiv listing pages or a bibliographic tool with your own saved search. That gives per query control and history, but it also gives you back the daily ritual that this repository exists to remove, and it does not produce a public table that others can read without visiting your own tooling. So the honest comparison is between a fixed, curated, free, public table on one side, and a configurable, private, historical feed on the other. Which one is better depends entirely on whether you want to read a community digest or maintain your own literature review. ## Conclusion SNN-Daily-Arxiv suits a researcher in neuromorphic computing who wants a low effort daily scan of new spiking neural network work and who is content to read the digest on the project page rather than in a personal feed. It does not suit a team that needs a queryable literature database, that needs a documented API, or that intends to redistribute the generated list, because the repository carries no licence file and the licence is recorded as unknown. Verify first by opening the current README table and the snn-arxiv-daily.json file to see whether the JSON carries the same records as the rendered Markdown, and by reading daily_arxiv.py for its query settings, since the README does not describe either. ## FAQ ### What does SNN-Daily-Arxiv do? It updates a daily list of arXiv papers about spiking neural networks. The repository contains daily_arxiv.py, the snn-arxiv-daily.json data file and a README.md that is regenerated with a table of publish dates, titles, authors and PDF links. ### How do I run the SNN-Daily-Arxiv script? The README does not document an installation or invocation, and no configuration for the script is described. The repository's top level entries are README.md, daily_arxiv.py, snn-arxiv-daily.json and a .github directory, so the script's query and schedule have to be read from the source and the workflow. ### How often is the paper list updated? The README heading records the date of the refresh, for example Updated on 2026.10.20, and the repository description says the papers are updated daily. The visible table lists papers published between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16. ### Does the list include updated versions of older papers? Yes. Several entries carry version suffixes other than v1, such as 2609.40258v2 and 2606.01442v3, and the latter is a June 2026 paper listed in the 2026-10-09 batch. That indicates the digest covers revisions as well as new submissions. ### Can I filter the SNN-Daily-Arxiv papers by topic or author? Not from the repository itself. Everything is filed under a single Spiking Neural Network heading, and there is no search, filtering or comparison tool documented. The snn-arxiv-daily.json file holds the same records in machine readable form and is the place to look for structured access. ### What licence is SNN-Daily-Arxiv under? The project metadata records the licence as unknown, and there is no LICENSE file among the repository's top level entries. Anyone planning to reuse the script or redistribute the generated list should confirm the terms with the maintainer first. ## Sources - [Issues](https://github.com/SpikingChen/SNN-Daily-Arxiv/issues) - [README](https://github.com/SpikingChen/SNN-Daily-Arxiv/blob/main/README.md) - [SpikingChen/SNN-Daily-Arxiv on GitHub](https://github.com/SpikingChen/SNN-Daily-Arxiv) --- Hysen Labs editorial analysis, written from the project's own repository and release notes. Cite the canonical page: https://hysenlabs.com/projects/spikingchen-snn-daily-arxiv