# Front-End-Projects: a shelf of small web projects with a contribution queue > Front-End-Projects is a repository that collects small front end projects, with a demo site that indexes them, a Projects/ directory, and a contribution model built around issues being assigned before any code is written. It is a portfolio and a practice ground rather than a library. **TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects** — This is a Repository where different types of Front - End Projects are present. If you have any front end project then you can contribute to this open source repository. - Repository: https://github.com/TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects - Website: https://frontendprojects.netlify.app/ - Stars: 562 · Forks: 685 - Language: JavaScript - License: MIT - Published: 2026-10-22 · Updated: 2026-10-22 · Language: en - Canonical page: https://hysenlabs.com/projects/tusharkesarwani-front-end-projects ## What the repository actually collects This is a repository where different types of front end projects are present, and if you have any front end project you can contribute to it. The project description is that plain, and the topic tags match it: cool-projects, css3, front-end-development, html5, javascript, open-source and web-development. The technology badges on the README name HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript, and the primary language recorded for the repository is JavaScript. The link to the Dart documentation appears in the tech stack list as well, so the intent is broader than the three badges, but the substance is the web platform and nothing more. There is no framework in the dependency list, because there is no dependency list, and the projects are self-contained. The top level listing shows how it is organised. There is a Projects/ directory holding the work, an index.html, a projects.js, a script.js and a style.css, an img/ directory, a CONTRIBUTING.md, a Code_of_conduct.md and the LICENSE. The four files at the root are the demo site, and there is a live deployment at frontendprojects.netlify.app, linked with a badge from the README. So the shape is a curated gallery. The repository is the collection, the site is the catalogue, and each entry under Projects/ is a small thing someone built and someone else can read, run and copy. The project is MIT licensed, the default branch is main, the homepage is the Netlify deployment, and the last push was on 2026-08-02. The repository publishes no GitHub releases, which is consistent with a collection of standalone artefacts rather than a versioned package. ## The contribution flow starts with an issue, not a pull request The How to Contribute section is specific about the order of operations, and it is the most useful thing in the README for anyone considering taking part. Take a look at the existing issues or create your own. Then wait for the issue to be assigned to you, after which you can start working on it. Fork the repo and create a branch for any issue you are working on. Create a pull request, which will be promptly reviewed, and suggestions will be added to improve it. And add screenshots, to help the maintainers know what the project is all about. The assignment step is the one that distinguishes this from a typical open source contribution. In most projects you can open a pull request against an open issue and a maintainer will pick it up. Here the instruction is to wait until the issue is assigned, which means the queue is managed rather than open, and that is a reasonable design for a repository where every contribution looks the same in shape and a maintainer has to decide which projects fit the gallery. The screenshots requirement is a gallery requirement. Since the site indexes the projects, a project without a picture is a project that will not render properly on the demo site, so requiring them is about the site rather than about code review. For people who are not ready to write code, the repository points at articles on the basics of Git and GitHub, covering forking a repo, cloning a repo and how to create a pull request, and it says you can also contact the Project Mentors in case you are stuck. ## The gallery is a static site with a JavaScript index The demo site is the part of the repository you can see without cloning, and the four root files tell you how it works. index.html is the page, style.css is the styling, projects.js is the data, and script.js is the behaviour. There is no framework in that list, so the site is a static page with a data file and a script, which is exactly what you would expect for a gallery that has to load quickly and be hosted on a static host. The projects.js file is the interesting one from a maintenance point of view. A gallery of this kind needs two things in sync: the Projects/ directory with the actual code, and the index that lists them with links and images. The screenshots the contribution guide asks for are the other half, and the img/ directory at the root is where the site assets live. The hosting choice is the same idea taken one step further. A Netlify deployment means the site is rebuilt from the repository, so contributing a project changes the gallery the next time the site is deployed, with no separate publishing step and no database. For a collection of static front end projects, that is a proportionate architecture, and it is why the repository can be a single folder of HTML, CSS and JavaScript without any build tooling of its own. The result is that the repository serves two audiences at once. A visitor to the site browses a gallery of small projects, and a contributor reads the same code with the intent of adding to it. ## Open source programs and mentorship are the framing The README has an Open Source Program section that places this project inside a wider ecosystem of first-time contributors, and it displays badges for two of them, SSOC 2.0 and SWOC 3.0. Those programs are the reason the contribution guide reads the way it does. A programme whose purpose is to get newcomers into open source has to make the first contribution survivable, and the guide does that by giving the exact sequence rather than a link to a generic how-to. The linked articles on forking, cloning and creating a pull request are the same material a newcomer would otherwise have to search for, and the offer to contact the mentors is a safety net for the step where a first-time contributor gets stuck on the issue tracker rather than on the code. The Project Admin section names a single person, TusharKesarwani, and there is a commented-out Project Mentors section left in the HTML, which suggests the mentor list was there and was removed or is pending. The README closes with a Happy Coding heading and an ask for a star, and the social links point to the maintainer's portfolio and LinkedIn. The judgement to make here is about the shape of the resource rather than its quality. A gallery like this is most valuable as a body of small, complete, readable examples. That is a real thing that a tutorial series does not give you, since the examples are finished artefacts rather than steps, and the topics span the kind of small interaction or visual effect that is hard to find a coherent tutorial for. ## What to expect when you read the code Because each project is standalone, reading the collection has a particular character, and it is worth being clear about the trade. The advantage is that everything is complete. A small front end project in a single file, with its styles and its script, can be read in one sitting and you can see the whole technique at once, which is the thing a series of incremental tutorial steps tends to hide. The topics the repository lists are the kind of thing where a working example is genuinely instructive: a specific CSS effect, a particular JavaScript interaction. The drawback is that the quality will vary, and the README gives you no signal about it. There is no style guide in the listing, no test setup, and no indication of which projects are beginner attempts and which are polished. The review is described as prompt, with suggestions added to improve the project, which is a good sign about the culture but not a filter you can rely on when browsing. So the way to use it is to pick a project, run it, and read it as one example among many. If you are looking for a specific technique, a repository of unrelated small projects is a much better search surface than a single tutorial, because there is no canonical version of the answer and you get several approaches side by side. The project is not archived, the licence is MIT so anything in it can be reused with attribution, and there are no releases, so the practical way to find what you want is the demo site and the directory listing rather than a changelog. ## Conclusion Adopt Front-End-Projects if you are learning front end development and want small, self-contained projects to read and to contribute to, or if you want a single place to point at work you have built. Do not treat it as a dependency source, because each project is a standalone artefact rather than an installable package, and there is no version contract across them. Before you contribute, read the open issues and wait to be assigned one, since the project asks for a branch per issue and a pull request with screenshots, and check the demo site to see the kind of project the maintainer is looking for. ## FAQ ### What is the Front-End-Projects repository? It is a repository where different types of front end projects are present, and anyone with a front end project can contribute it. The primary language is JavaScript, with HTML5 and CSS3 in the tech stack, and the projects are indexed on a demo site at frontendprojects.netlify.app. ### How do I contribute a project to Front-End-Projects? Look at the existing issues or create your own, wait for the issue to be assigned to you, fork the repo and create a branch for that issue, then open a pull request with screenshots so the maintainers can see what the project is. ### What licence does Front-End-Projects use? MIT. The repository has a LICENSE file at the root, along with a CONTRIBUTING.md and a Code_of_conduct.md, and the README links the contributing guidelines. ### Is there an open source programme for contributing to Front-End-Projects? Yes. The README states that the project is part of following Open Source Programs and displays badges for SSOC 2.0 and SWOC 3.0. It also points at articles on forking a repo, cloning a repo and creating a pull request, and offers contact with the Project Mentors for anyone who is stuck. ## Sources - [Issues](https://github.com/TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects/issues) - [License: MIT](https://github.com/TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects/blob/main/LICENSE) - [Project website](https://frontendprojects.netlify.app/) - [README](https://github.com/TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects/blob/main/README.md) - [TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects on GitHub](https://github.com/TusharKesarwani/Front-End-Projects) --- Hysen Labs editorial analysis, written from the project's own repository and release notes. Cite the canonical page: https://hysenlabs.com/projects/tusharkesarwani-front-end-projects