Newest tag from 2023, news log running to 2025, default branch dev
Bio-Computing Platform Featuring Large-Scale Representation Learning and Multi-Task Deep Learning.
At a glance
- What is it?
- PaddleHelix collects PaddlePaddle implementations of protein structure prediction, molecular docking, compound property prediction, and drug target interaction work, published mostly as news entries with links into an apps directory. What the page adds up to is a release history that stopped in August 2023 while the announcements continue into 2025, a licence field that resolves to nothing while a licence file sits at the root, a build script whose comments describe a Python 2 era and a project file the tree does not contain, and a licence boundary that moved from non-commercial academic to a paid API within three months.
- Who is it for?
- PaddleHelix is a reference collection rather than a product, and the value is in the individual papers and their code paths: a monomer folder, a complex folder, a docking folder, and the compound pre-training work are all separable pieces you can read on their own. Three things to check first.
- Can I use it commercially?
- Check first. The repository uses a licence we do not classify automatically, so read its LICENSE file before any commercial use.
- Is it still maintained?
- Activity is slowing. The repository last received commits 7 months ago.
- What is it written in?
- Mainly Python, according to GitHub's language statistics.
Answers come from the project's GitHub data, last synced on November 14, 2026, and from our analysis. They are not legal advice.
Star history
- PaddlePaddle/PaddleHelix1,122 ★ · +2
| Repository | 2026-09-10 | 2026-11-14 |
|---|---|---|
| PaddlePaddle/PaddleHelix | 1.1k | 1.1k |
2 Stars in the last 65 days, measured from the daily GitHub snapshot. Compare with other projects
Editorial analysis
The tags stopped in 2023 while the announcements kept going
Three releases are visible: v1.0 on 2021-07-09, v1.1.0 on 2021-12-15, and v1.2.2 on 2023-08-01. The gap in that sequence is as informative as the entries, since 1.1.0 is followed by 1.2.2 with no 1.2.0 or 1.2.1 in sight. The announcements, by contrast, run to 2025.07.23, when HelixFold3.2 was released as an improvement on HelixFold3 in protein related tasks and structural quality, with its code at `apps/protein_folding/helixfold3`.
So the newest tag is roughly two and a half years older than the newest announcement, and the last recorded push to the repository is 2026-03-31. The default branch is `dev` rather than `main`, and one older entry links into it directly, the 2021.11.23 protein-protein interaction paper pointing at `tree/dev/apps/protein_protein_interaction`. Anyone following version numbers here is reading a series that stopped before most of the work on the page existed.
Open for academic research, paid API for everyone else
The licensing story changes inside the timeline. The 2024.08.15 entry releases the codes and model parameters of HelixFold3, described as biomolecular structure prediction replicating the capabilities of AlphaFold3, and states that the initial release is available as open source on GitHub for non-commercial academic research. The accuracy claim is scoped in the same sentence: comparable to AlphaFold3 in predicting the structures of conventional ligands, nucleic acids, and proteins.
Three months later the picture is different. The 2024.11.08 entry introduces a convenient paid API for academic and commercial applications, with a usage guide on the project site, described as a way to make HelixFold3 integration easier and to support high-throughput use. Between the two sits the 2024.08.30 note that an initial version of the HelixFold3 server is available on the project's website.
For anyone outside academic research, the usable path is therefore the hosted API and the hosted server, not the repository. The repository remains the place where the models were first published under a non-commercial label.
One paper's code link points at somebody else's repository
Almost every entry in the news log links into `apps/`, and those paths are the real index of the collection. Protein folding appears as `apps/protein_folding/helixfold`, `apps/protein_folding/helixfold-single`, and `apps/protein_folding/helixfold3`. Docking is `apps/molecular_docking/helixdock`. Compound pre-training is `apps/pretrained_compound/ChemRL/GEM` and the same path one level deeper for `GEM-2`. Drug target interaction is `apps/drug_target_interaction/batchdta`.
The exception is instructive. The 2024.05.13 entry for the motif-aware RNA language modelling paper accepted by Nature Machine Intelligence links its code to `github.com/CatIIIIIIII/RNAErnie`, a personal repository outside this project rather than a path under `apps/`. A few other entries point at papers with no code path at all, including the HelixADMET and HelixMO publications, so the log mixes code releases with paper announcements and does not mark which is which.
The page is a news log, and the guides are elsewhere
There is no install command on this page. Everything at the top is dated announcements, and the navigational work is pushed into files: `installation_guide.md` and `developer_guide.md`, each with a Chinese mirror named `_cn.md`, a `docs/` directory that a `.readthedocs.yml` builds, a `tutorials/` directory, and a second README in Chinese. The root also holds `competition/`, `research/`, `scripts/`, and a `c/` directory for native code with a `CMakeLists.txt` beside it.
That layout is the practical answer to a reader arriving from a search result. The project name is 螺旋桨, the bio-computing toolset, and the repository is a container for a dozen research efforts rather than one installable tool, which is why the documentation is split into a user-facing installation guide, a developer guide, and rendered docs. The Python package itself is `pahelix/`, and the `setup.py` at the root builds it.
The build script needs CMake and its comments describe another era
`setup.py` defines a `CMakeExtension` that takes a source directory instead of a list of source files, and a `CMakeBuild` command that runs `cmake --version` before building, raising a runtime error reading CMake missing, probably upgrade to a newer version of Pip. The extension output directory has `pahelix/toolkit/` appended to it, which the comment describes as required for auto-detection of auxiliary native libraries, and the configuration is Debug or Release depending on the build flag. A `CMAKE_GENERATOR` environment variable is honoured, with a note that Conda-Build can set it, and a table maps four Windows platform tags to CMake architectures: `win32` to Win32, `win-amd64` to x64, `win-arm32` to ARM, and `win-arm64` to ARM64.
The comments have drifted. One says that since CMake is forced via PEP 518 in the pyproject.toml this should never happen and the whole method could be removed, yet no pyproject.toml appears in the repository listing, which lists `setup.py` and no project file. Another explains that super() is avoided to support Python 2 because distutils classes are old-style, in a file that imports from setuptools and uses f-string free modern packaging.
One leaderboard rank and a wall clock figure are the two hard numbers
Most entries claim improvement without a figure on the page. Two do not. The 2022.08.11 HelixGEM-2 entry states that the model ranked first on the OGB PCQM4Mv2 leaderboard, with the leaderboard linked, which is the only third-party ranking claim in the log. The 2022.07.18 HelixFold entry gives wall clock numbers instead: the complete training time was optimised from 11 days to 5.12 days, and ultra-long monomer proteins of around 6600 amino acids became supported, with the paper and the code both linked.
Everything else in the timeline is a venue. The HelixFold-Single method is listed as accepted by Nature Machine Intelligence on 2023.10.09, the motif-aware RNA paper on 2024.05.13, HelixMO as accepted at BIBM 2022, and the multimodal protein-protein interaction paper as accepted at MLCB 2021, with docking-based virtual screening at BIBM 2021 and property-aware relation networks at NeurIPS 2021. Two announcements also describe running services rather than code: drug design for the HelixMO work, and online structure prediction for proteins and complexes.
The licence field resolves to nothing and a licence file exists
The licence recorded for this repository is NOASSERTION, which is the absence of a value rather than a licence. A `LICENSE` file is present at the root, so the metadata and the tree disagree about whether terms were detected, and nothing on the page says which applies to the code and which to the model parameters. Combined with the non-commercial wording attached to the HelixFold3 release and the paid API for commercial use three months later, the terms are worth reading directly rather than assuming a single open-source grant.
The archiving path is the other visible convention. A Zenodo badge carries DOI 314704349, which is how a release of this collection is meant to be cited when the repository itself does not tell you. The page also points at a project site under the paddlehelix.baidu.com domain for online structure prediction, drug design, and complex prediction services, several of which are announced alongside the papers.
Editorial conclusion
PaddleHelix is a reference collection rather than a product, and the value is in the individual papers and their code paths: a monomer folder, a complex folder, a docking folder, and the compound pre-training work are all separable pieces you can read on their own. Three things to check first. Pick a paper rather than a version, because the tags stopped at v1.2.2 in August 2023 while the announcements continue to July 2025 and the last recorded push is 2026-03-31. Read the licence question carefully, because the metadata resolves to no assertion while a licence file exists at the root, and the HelixFold3 release is described as open source for non-commercial academic research with commercial use routed to a paid API. And expect to build from source with CMake if you want the native toolkit, since the page carries no install command of its own and points at a separate installation guide instead.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best software for protein structure prediction according to PaddleHelix?
The page does not rank tools. It names HelixFold-Single, HelixFold, HelixFold-Multimer, HelixFold3, and HelixFold3.2, and states only their own properties: HelixFold-Single is an MSA-free pipeline working from primary sequences that predicts within seconds, HelixFold supports ultra-long monomers of around 6600 amino acids with training time reduced from 11 days to 5.12, and HelixFold3 reaches accuracy comparable to AlphaFold3 for conventional ligands, nucleic acids, and proteins.
How do I install PaddleHelix?
The front page is a news log and contains no install command, so the installation guide is a separate file, `installation_guide.md`, with a Chinese mirror `installation_guide_cn.md`, alongside `developer_guide.md` and a `docs/` site built from `.readthedocs.yml`. Building from source goes through CMake, which `setup.py` checks for and reports as missing if it cannot run `cmake --version`.
Can PaddleHelix be used commercially?
The HelixFold3 codes and model parameters were released as open source for non-commercial academic research on 2024-08-15. On 2024-11-08 a paid API was introduced for academic and commercial applications, described as a way to make integration easier and support high-throughput use, so commercial use is routed through the hosted service.
Where is the code for the models PaddleHelix announces?
Most entries link into `apps/`, covering protein folding at `helixfold`, `helixfold-single`, and `helixfold3`, docking at `helixdock`, compound pre-training at `ChemRL/GEM` and `ChemRL/GEM-2`, and drug target interaction at `batchdta`. One RNA paper links to an external personal repository, and a few announcements cover papers with no code path at all.
Is protein folding solved, on PaddleHelix's own account?
The repository makes a narrower claim. HelixFold3 is described as achieving accuracy comparable to AlphaFold3 in predicting the structures of conventional ligands, nucleic acids, and proteins, and HelixFold3.2 is described as showing significant improvements over HelixFold3 in protein related tasks and structural quality. No general statement about the state of the field appears anywhere on the page.
Official sources
Add this badge to your README
If you maintain this project, the badge below links readers to this analysis and shows its maintenance status from the daily GitHub snapshot. Paste the markdown into your README; add ?metric=license or ?metric=stars to the image URL for a different field.
[](https://hysenlabs.com/projects/paddlepaddle-paddlehelix)Star history chart for your README
[](https://hysenlabs.com/projects/paddlepaddle-paddlehelix)Was this useful?