AndyMik90/Aperant: README-based editorial guide

AndyMik90/Aperant describes itself in the README as "Autonomous multi-session AI coding". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "Aperant (formerly Auto Claude)", the README says: Autonomous multi-agent coding framework that plans, builds, and validates software for you.. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.

The README's "Requirements" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: Git repository - Your project must be initialized as a git repo. If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: Claude Code CLI - npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code. It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.

The operating model is spread across sections such as "Download". The source evidence includes: > 🛠️ These are 2.x maintenance builds. They're stable and fully usable today, but active development has moved to Aperant 3.0 (see status above). Expect critical fixes here rather than new features.. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.

Start installation from the README's documented entry point. A command that can be checked in the source is: README 没有给出可直接复制的安装命令。 When the README contains no runnable command, this article does not invent one. Open its "🚀 Status: Aperant 3.0 in active development" section and confirm system dependencies, default ports, and first-run initialization before using a public server.