Nutlope/hallmark: README-based editorial guide

Nutlope/hallmark describes itself in the README as "Anti-AI-slop design skill for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex.". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "Hallmark", the README says: A design skill for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex that refuses to look AI-generated.. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.

The README's "Install" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: Codex: /.codex/skills/hallmark/ (personal) or .codex/skills/hallmark/ (project-scoped). If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: Cursor: .cursor/rules/hallmark.mdc (body of SKILL.md, no frontmatter). It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.

The operating model is spread across sections such as "Hallmark". The source evidence includes: Hallmark picks a macrostructure for the brief, dresses it in one of twenty themes, runs fifty-seven slop-test gates plus a pre-emit self-critique, and refuses the on-distribution defaults every LLM was trained into.. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.

Start installation from the README's documented entry point. A command that can be checked in the source is: README 没有给出可直接复制的安装命令。 When the README contains no runnable command, this article does not invent one. Open its "Four verbs" section and confirm system dependencies, default ports, and first-run initialization before using a public server.