openclaw/lobster: README-based editorial guide

openclaw/lobster describes itself in the README as "Lobster is a Openclaw-native workflow shell: a typed, local-first "macro engine" that turns skills/tools into composable pipelines and safe automations,and lets Openclaw call those workflows in one step.". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "🦞 Lobster", the README says: An OpenClaw-native workflow shell: typed (JSON-first) pipelines, jobs, and approval gates.. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.

The README's "Goals" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: No new auth surface: Lobster must not own OAuth/tokens.. If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: Typed pipelines (objects/arrays), not text pipes.. It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.

The operating model is spread across sections such as "Workflow files". The source evidence includes: Lobster workflow files are meant to read like small scripts:. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.

Start installation from the README's documented entry point. A command that can be checked in the source is: README 没有给出可直接复制的安装命令。 When the README contains no runnable command, this article does not invent one. Open its "Example of Lobster at work" section and confirm system dependencies, default ports, and first-run initialization before using a public server.