Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode: README-based editorial guide

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode describes itself in the README as "Teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "oh-my-claudecode", the README says: > For Codex users: Check out oh-my-codex , the same orchestration experience for OpenAI Codex CLI.. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.

The README's "CLI Commands vs In-Session Skills" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: In-session skills: run /... inside a Claude Code session after installing the plugin/setup flow.. If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: Terminal CLI commands: run omc ... from your shell after installing the npm/runtime path (npm i -g oh-my-claude-sisyphus@latest) or from a local checkout.. It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.

The operating model is spread across sections such as "Core Maintainers". The source evidence includes: | Role | Name | GitHub | | -------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------- | | Creator & Lead | Yeachan Heo | @Yeachan-Heo |. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.