oh-my-openagent
omo/lazycodex: The coding agent for tokenmaxxers;the one and only agent harness for complex codebases. For your Codex, for your OpenCode
Oh My OpenAgent, the coding agent harness in three editions
Oh My OpenAgent ships as two plugins and a standalone beta, and its README pairs the setup guide with reviews and a claim that Anthropic blocked OpenCode because of it.
The three editions
The README describes Ultimate as the full plugin for OpenCode, carrying 11 agents, 54 plus lifecycle hooks, five built in MCPs, every slash command, Team Mode, the ulw-loop, ultrawork, and hashline edits. Light is the smaller fit for the Codex CLI plugin system, with portable pieces like rules, a comment checker, git bash, LSP, and telemetry, plus plugin scoped MCPs and a shared ast grep skill, but no agent orchestration or team tools. Senpi is the standalone beta, installed as its own command rather than loaded into a host.
How it gets built
The maintainer says the project is built live with Jobdori, an AI assistant running on a heavily customized fork of OpenClaw. Every feature, fix, and issue triage happens in the open in a Discord community. A roadmap label tracks the restructuring toward multiple agent harnesses, OpenCode, Codex, Pi, and others, and the README points contributors to the ROADMAP before opening PRs.
The Anthropic claim
The README states plainly that Anthropic blocked OpenCode because of this project, and that the team has switched to backing Codex. It argues against being locked into a single provider, saying models get cheaper and smarter every month and that the future is orchestrating many of them rather than picking one winner.
The reviews
Quoted reviews are attributed to named individuals. One says the project led the author to cancel a Cursor subscription. Another describes converting a 45k line Tauri app into a SaaS web app overnight using the project plus a ralph loop. The endorsements read as promotional, which is how the README presents them.
Editorial conclusion
The reviews quoted in the README are promotional, so the endorsements should be read that way. The rest of this write up retells what the project says about itself.
Community notes