tensorflow-generative-model-collections
GitHub describes it as Collection of generative models in Tensorflow. The repository metadata lists Python as its primary language. The metadata lists the Apache-2.0 license. This article stays within the project description and details documented in the GitHub repository README.
hwalsuklee/tensorflow-generative-model-collections: Pytorch version
GitHub describes it as Collection of generative models in Tensorflow. The repository metadata lists Python as its primary language. The metadata lists the Apache-2.0 license. This article stays within the project description and details documented in the GitHub repository README.
Repository scope
GitHub describes it as Collection of generative models in Tensorflow. The repository metadata lists Python as its primary language. The metadata lists the Apache-2.0 license. The README describes the project this way: Pytorch version of this repository is availabel at https://github.com/znxlwm/pytorch-generative-model-collections
"Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study" Paper
The README section ""Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study" Paper" states: https://github.com/google/compare gan is the code that was used in the paper. It provides IS/FID and rich experimental results for all gan-variants.
Lists
The README section "Lists" states: Name | Paper Link | Value Function :---: | :---: | :--- | GAN | Arxiv | LSGAN | Arxiv | WGAN | Arxiv | WGAN GP | Arxiv | DRAGAN | Arxiv | CGAN | Arxiv | infoGAN | Arxiv | ACGAN | Arxiv | EBGAN | Arxiv | BEGAN | Arxiv |
Results for mnist
The README section "Results for mnist" states: Network architecture of generator and discriminator is the exaclty sames as in infoGAN paper. For fair comparison of core ideas in all gan variants, all implementations for network architecture are kept same except EBGAN and BEGAN. Small modification is made for EBGAN/BEGAN, since those adopt auto-encoder strucutre for discriminator. But I tried to keep the capacity of discirminator.
Editorial conclusion
The repository README is the source for this review. It does not replace a local installation or an independent test.
Community notes