dohooo/helmor: README-based editorial guide

dohooo/helmor describes itself in the README as "Open-source local workbench for multi-agent software development.". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "README", the README says: The local-first workbench for orchestrating coding agents.. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.

The README's "Features" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: Bring your own agents , Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and Kimi Code; your logins, API keys, and custom providers.. If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: Isolated workspaces , one git worktree and branch per task; agents never step on each other.. It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.

The operating model is spread across sections such as "README". The source evidence includes: Helmor runs many coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated git workspace , conversation, diffs, editor, terminals, and one-click PR actions in one window. Everything lives locally under /helmor/.. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.

Start installation from the README's documented entry point. A command that can be checked in the source is: README 没有给出可直接复制的安装命令。 When the README contains no runnable command, this article does not invent one. Open its "How it works" section and confirm system dependencies, default ports, and first-run initialization before using a public server.