Graphify-Labs/graphify: README-based editorial guide
A guide grounded in the README, repository metadata, and license for installing and checking Graphify-Labs/graphify.
Project scope
Graphify-Labs/graphify describes itself in the README as "Turn any codebase, with its docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs, into a queryable knowledge graph. A /graphify skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI: local deterministic AST parsing, every edge explained, no vector store.". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "README", the README says: 🇺🇸 English | 🇨🇳 简体中文 | 🇯🇵 日本語 | 🇰🇷 한국어 | 🇩🇪 Deutsch | 🇫🇷 Français | 🇪🇸 Español | 🇮🇳 हिन्दी | 🇧🇷 Português | 🇷🇺 Русский | 🇸🇦 العربية | 🇮🇷 فارسی | 🇮🇹 Italiano | 🇵🇱 Polski | 🇳🇱 Nederlands | 🇹🇷 Türkçe | 🇺🇦. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.
Suitable use cases
The README's "README" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: Every edge is explained. Each connection is tagged EXTRACTED (explicit in the source) or INFERRED (resolved by graphify), so you can tell what was read directly from what was inferred.. If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: Code maps for free, fully local. Code is parsed with tree-sitter AST: deterministic, no LLM, nothing leaves your machine. (Docs, PDFs, images and video use your assistant's model, or a configured API key, for a semantic pass.). It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.
How it works
The operating model is spread across sections such as "README". The source evidence includes: > Want this always-on, updating in the background across your code, docs, and meetings rather than only on demand? That is what we are building at graphify.com.. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.