tomasz-tomczyk/crit: README-based editorial guide

tomasz-tomczyk/crit describes itself in the README as "Your feedback loop with the agent". This article keeps to facts that can be checked in the repository. Stars, forks, and promotional badges are signals of attention, not proof of quality. Under "Crit", the README says: Review and comment on plans, code diffs, frontend elements and send feedback directly to your agent.. That establishes the project's stated boundary, not a production test.

The README's "Adaptive UI for each type of output" section gives a useful starting point for deciding whether the project fits: crit auto-detects git changes and shows syntax-highlighted diffs for local review.. If that problem is not yours, popularity is a poor reason to adopt it. Project names, commands, and component names are kept as written so a reader can return to the primary source without guessing at terminology. Another checkable README item is: crit plan.md renders a markdown file with proper formatting and review UI. It can shape a first test, but it does not replace testing in the intended environment.

The operating model is spread across sections such as "Adaptive UI for each type of output". The source evidence includes: Crit adds a proper interface for each type of output and lets you point at the exact thing that is wrong and leave a comment for the agent to fix:. This article does not turn missing architecture, performance, or security details into claims. A real deployment still needs a look at the repository layout, configuration files, and release history.

Start installation from the README's documented entry point. A command that can be checked in the source is: brew install crit When the README contains no runnable command, this article does not invent one. Open its "Adaptive UI for each type of output" section and confirm system dependencies, default ports, and first-run initialization before using a public server.