Compare other tools| Tool | Make | Pipedream |
|---|
| Price | From $12/month | From $99/month$1080/year billed annually |
|---|
| Free plan | Free plan | Free plan |
|---|
| Best for | - Technical users and agencies who need precise data mapping between apps
- Teams building multi-branch workflows with conditional routing
- Developers who want a visual builder without maintaining servers
| - Developers who want to write code for integrations without managing servers
- Engineering teams building custom event-driven workflows across internal and external APIs
- Users who need a large pre-built action library alongside the ability to write custom code
|
|---|
| Ease of use | Takes some experience | Takes some experience |
|---|
| Key features | - Canvas-based visual flow editor
- Data mapping and transformation between modules
- HTTP and webhook modules for arbitrary API calls
- Conditional routing and error handling
- Thousands of app connectors
| - Code steps in Node.js, Python, Go and Bash
- Serverless execution with no infrastructure to manage
- HTTP, schedule, email and app event triggers
- Pre-built action library for common integrations
- Version history and step-level logging
|
|---|
| Integrations | Google Workspace, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Airtable, Notion, Shopify | GitHub, Slack, Airtable, Google Workspace, Stripe, Twilio, Webhook |
|---|
| API | Available | Available |
|---|
| Skill level | Intermediate, Advanced | Intermediate, Advanced |
|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Command line, API |
|---|
| Main advantages | - Visual canvas makes complex, multi-branch flows easier to understand
- Fine-grained data mapping handles transformations Zapier cannot
- Free plan supports a useful number of operations per month
| - Full code access means no workaround is needed for unsupported transformations
- Serverless hosting removes the need to maintain any automation infrastructure
- Step-level logging makes debugging workflow failures fast
|
|---|
| Main disadvantages | - Steeper learning curve than simpler trigger-action platforms
- No self-hosting option
| - Requires coding ability and is not suited to non-technical users
- No self-hosting option for teams with strict data residency requirements
|
|---|
| Data checked | Checked October 4, 2026 | Checked October 4, 2026 |
|---|
| Try Make | Try Pipedream |
|---|
Which one to choose
Choose Make if
- Technical users and agencies who need precise data mapping between apps
- Teams building multi-branch workflows with conditional routing
- Developers who want a visual builder without maintaining servers
Read review
Choose Pipedream if
- Developers who want to write code for integrations without managing servers
- Engineering teams building custom event-driven workflows across internal and external APIs
- Users who need a large pre-built action library alongside the ability to write custom code
Read review